|
ARC
Board Letter to AKC Working Judges (4th
Quarter 2001):
Dear Judges:
The American
Rottweiler Club would like to thank you for the
time, thoughtfulness and energy you bring to
your judging of our breed. We believe that
your conscientious selections contribute greatly
to the quality of the Rottweiler in this
country.
At this time, we
are writing to reaffirm our position supporting
the American Kennel Club Rottweiler breed
standard, which describes the Rottweiler as a
docked breed.
"Tail
docked short, close to body, leaving one to
two tail vertebrae."
The Rottweiler is
a large, strong, handsome, and easily recognized
breed and one of its defining characteristics is
the docked tail. We appreciate your
attention to this important attribute of breed
type.
~
~ ~
ARC
Tails Survey Results
(3rd
Quarter 2001):
Option 1
The American Rottweiler Club should advise
AKC judges to judge the exhibit on its merits if
a dog is presented to them with an undocked
tail. Received 170
votes / 36%
Option 2
The American Rottweiler Club should advise
AKC judges to make their own decision if a dog
is presented to them with an undocked tail.
Received 65 votes / 14%
Option 3
The American Rottweiler Club should advise
AKC judges to excuse any dog which is presented
to them with an undocked tail. Received
184 votes / 38%
Option 4
The American Rottweiler Club should revise
our current standard to include a description of
a correct tail.
Received
33 votes /
7%
Option 5
The American Rottweiler Club should revise
our current standard to include an undocked tail
as a disqualifying fault. (Please
note: this will affect all Mandatory
Practices/Code of Ethic Clubs in regards to
breeding a dog with a disqualifying fault.)
Received 26 votes / 5%
~
~ ~
ARC
Board Statement (2nd
Quarter 2001): The dilemma which has
swept across Europe concerning the tail docking
issue has now touched upon our our shores and
has become an unavoidable issue, which requires
our immediate attention.
We are cognizant
of our constituents who spoke so passionately at
the National meeting in May and understand that
there are many sides to the tail docking
issue. Therefore, a survey has been
developed which will allow you to voice you
opinion regarding Rottweilers who are undocked
and competing in an AKC conformation ring.
In a past ARK
publication you read the recommendation from the
Tail Docking Committee consisting of Cathy
Thompson, Joe Hedl, Julie Dikeman and Peter
Piusz. We are including in our cover
letter excerpts from letters written by a few of
the committee members. Please read these
carefully, as we feel they are important.
~
~ ~
Mr. Joe Hedl:
"I have always believed that our dogs
should not have a tail. The Rottweiler is
a very distinguished breed and one of the most
distinguishing characteristics is the fact that
Rottweilers do not have tails. I
personally like the look and presence of the
Rottweiler without a tail. After reviewing
the points you have mentioned, I must say that I
agree that we should not change the standard to
a disqualifying fault if a dog has a tail.
We would certainly lose the gene pool of the
foreign-bred dogs from countries no longer
allowing tail docking. I do believe that
our standard should remain as is and that it be
at the AKC judge's discretion as to how to judge
a dog presented with a tail as stated in Option
2 of the Questionnaire."
Mr. Peter Piusz:
"Under AKC guidelines where there are
different versions of the breed with and without
tails, dew claws, or ears (cropped), the judge
has the option of judging using their interpretation
of the breed standard to place the dog based on overall
quality in competition or to excuse the dogs as
not in accordance with breed standard.
This is entirely the judge's choice and is
outside the scope of authority of the American
Rottweiler Club. It may be easier if you
understand that he view of the AKC and the
Delegates and the all-breed clubs is that every
breed is governed by the same show rules and
there can be no exceptions. AKC made the recommendation
that it did to try to minimize the docking and
cropping issue and its legal implications.
With regard to this, we can talk about judge's
education, we3 can talk about petitioning the
parent club committee for support to change the
AKC guidelines, but we cannot talk about what
judges will and will not do as there is no way
to guarantee their actions."
Mrs. Cathy
Thompson: "As a judge my job is to
find the BEST dog. I am to find the dog
with the MOST. Therefore I am supposed to
use a positive scale for judging. Everyone
hates fault judges. It a tailed Rottweiler
comes into my ring I want to be able to judge
the dog's qualities against the competition's
good qualities. If the tailed dog has the
best type and best movement I should be able to
put it up -- if isn't the best then it does not
go up."
~
~ ~
ARC
SURVEY (shortened version)
(click
here for entire version)
- You must be an
ARC current member and in good
standing. If you're not a member of
ARC and wish to join, click
here.
- You must
circle only one option.
- You must
return the questionnaire by August 30, 2001.
- You must sign
your name in the space provided.
Option 1
The American Rottweiler Club should advise
AKC judges to judge the exhibit on its merits if
a dog is presented to them with an undocked
tail.
Option 2
The American Rottweiler Club should advise
AKC judges to make their own decision if a dog
is presented to them with an undocked tail.
Option 3
The American Rottweiler Club should advise
AKC judges to excuse any dog which is presented
to them with an undocked tail.
Option 4
The American Rottweiler Club should revise
our current standard to include a description of
a correct tail.
Option 5
The American Rottweiler Club should revise
our current standard to include an undocked tail
as a disqualifying fault. (Please
note: this will affect all Mandatory
Practices/Code of Ethic Clubs in regards to
breeding a dog with a disqualifying fault.)
ARC
Board Statement (1st
Quarter 2001): Our decision on tails was
to leave the standard as is. While our
standard does call for a docked tail, there is
no disqualification or even serious fault listed
for having a tail. The Board decided that
we would have the ARC Tail Docking Committee and
the Judges Education Committee work together to
draft a letter to the AKC judges. This
letter would request that if a Rottweiler should
come into their ring with a tail, that they
judge the dog as if there were no tail.
The Board will need to approve the letter and we
have every intention of publishing it for all
ARC members to read. There is none of us
on the Board who would like to see tails become
part of the American Standard. We all want
to see the Rottweiler remain as it, with a
docked tail, and we do not intend to blindly
follow the ADRK or any other country's
registry. That said, what other countries
do, does affect us to some extent.
Our
Online Poll Results
Von
Wertz Rottweiler Poll Question:
Should
the U.S. Rottweiler Standard add a
disqualification for dogs shown with a full
tail?
Poll
ended 07/28/01.
Here is the breakdown of 100 votes received:
| Yes |
70
(70%) |
| No |
21
(21%) |
| Not
sure |
9
(9%) |
-
Comments
offered:
-
Docked tails only for the Rottweiler!
-
I have a 1yr. old and a 6 mo old and the 6mo old
is just as beautiful as the 1yr old.
-
I prefer docked tails, and would never buy a
Rottweiler with a tail.
-
Rottweilers are well known for the docked tails.
They are beautiful animals without it.
-
Rottweilers just look better with docked tails.
-
Germany rules when it comes to Rottweilers, so
get ready!
-
I have 2 neutered males both with docked tails
and I love that, however I am not going to tell
someone else that they should or should not dock
or for that matter ear crop on some breeds as
well. I will always buy my Rotties with docked
tails because that is my preference. In all
honesty we should not focus so much attention on
to dock or not but on protecting the breed from
breed bans, bad publicity. I am more for
protecting the breeds personality, temperament,
and yes the looks from people wanting to
terminate them or from the back yard breeders
than whether we dock or not. Don't get me wrong
I will fight to keep tails docked but that
doesn't mean that everyone has to agree with me.
- Let
Germany have their tails. Leave America alone, the
Rottweiler in the U.S. has always had their tails
docked. Get real, it looks better!
-
Since when does Germany have to rule in the USA!
Our Rotties equal theirs and then some. As
Americans, we can stand up on our own. The
docked tails should stay in America. I also
think that we as breeders of such a wonderful
breed as the Rottweiler, should be aware that
just having a docked tail is not all. We should
also strive for stable personalities and clear
minds, especially in the field of SchH. We have
alot of dogs in that area that are not truly
stable. I've seen them and I would not like to
have one like that. We need to breed for the
whole Rottweiler, which includes , color, clear
markings, dark eyes, dark mouths, great
temperaments and stable and clear minds in
whatever area you choose to work your Rottweiler
in. Plus they need to be socialized and have
good manners, by doing CGC's and TT's. Rotties
typically own you. So give them the best of
everything in learning experiences and lots and
lots of love. They'll repay you ten-fold.
-
Just because Germany bowed down to politics,
doesn't mean we in the USA have to adopt the no
tail docking rule! Germany clearly went over
board in the unsound temperaments they were
producing in not just the Rottweiler, but many
of there working breeds. In order to continue to
own and breed Rottweilers, they felt my
softening the dogs looks, "tail
wagging" they allowed this stupid ruling on
tails, !! I don't think we in the USA should be
forced to follow this change)) we are the ARC,
AKC, not ADRK!!! I think this is just beginning,
soon you will see more Rotts in Germany with
CD's, etc, and less SCH titles, etc, if they are
to be allowed to continue to own-breed
Rottweilers by there government. Unfortunately
many of the Rotts that cant pass a simple BH in
Germany due to unsound temperaments, will find
there way in to USA!
|